Our Articles
You can choos our articles from menu in below …
Weld destructive testing is performed for several purposes e.g. to qualify a welding procedure specification, to qualify a welder or welding operator or to conduct a production testing.
To qualify a Welding Procedure Specification (WPS)
The welding procedure is written based on the experience and welding knowledge, but some mechanical testing shall be performed to qualify it.
For example, you write a WPS for stainless steel material such as ASTM A240 TP 316L; you determine P number, A number, thickness range, filler metal type and diameter, joint configuration, welding machine voltage and amperage, etc.
Your WPS is ready; you need a welder to weld a test coupon for you. The test specimen is welded, cut it up and sent to the mechanical testing laboratory. Two tension tests, two root bend tests, and two face bend tests are performed.
If the result of tests were satisfactory and met the acceptance criteria, then your WPS is qualified. So if your job is the pressure vessel, piping, and storage tank, then these tests are performed based on ASME Section IX.
If the job is about steel structure, then your weld destructive testing shall be done based on AWS D1.1 and if the job is in the pipeline, your destructive testing for WPS shall be performed based on requirements of API 1104.
To qualify a Welder or Welding Operator
The welders and welding operator normally qualified with radiographic testing or ultrasonic testing but some employer prefer to do mechanical testing (destructive testing). To qualify a welder, you need to cut the test coupon and perform one root bend and one face bend test (based on ASME IX).
Please note in some welding process we are not allowed to perform RT or UT test to qualify a welder or welding operator, and we have to use weld destructive testing. For example, you can not qualify a welder by RT or UT for GMAW-S and FCAW welding process.
Any welding code or standard has own requirements for mechanical testing for welder performance qualification e.g. ASME IX, API 1104, AWS D1.1, etc.
Weld Destructive Testing for Production Test
Sometimes we perform destructive testing based on project requirements. For example, there is process piping project, and you have 2000 thousand piping joints for welding.
The project specification requires one joint to be selected in each 100 joints for mechanical testing. This is a destructive testing, and you will lose that welded joint but this a way to make sure the welded joints has adequate ductility and other desired mechanical properties.
This method is not very common, but some customer consider this requirement on their project specification.
Acceptance Criteria for Destructive Testing
The acceptance criteria is indicated in each related code or standard. For example ASME IX requires that the weld tensile strength should not be less than minimum specified tensile strength of material.
If the test coupon broke at the base metal and out of the weld portion, then it would be acceptable if tensile strength was more than 95% of minimum specified tensile strength.
In the same standard, after bend test, no crack should be more than 1/8 inch in the stressed surface.
When you received the laboratory test report, you should refer to addressed standard to identify acceptability of the test. You need to compare the measured values in the test report with the acceptance range in the standard.
Return to Industrial Inspection
Executive Summary & Industrial Inspection Scope
In demanding industrial environments across Oil, Gas, Petrochemical, Offshore, and Heavy Process Infrastructure, rigorous compliance with ASME Section IX, AWS D1.1, EN ISO 15614 is essential to ensure operational integrity, personnel safety, and compliance with statutory regulatory frameworks. This technical specification provides QA/QC managers, procurement engineers, welding inspectors, and third-party inspection (TPI) agencies with an authoritative, field-tested guideline for “What Is The Weld Destructive Testing”.
Ensuring compliance regarding what is the weld destructive testing minimizes the risk of catastrophic asset failures, costly unscheduled shutdowns, and supplier non-conformances. The following technical sections delineate the scope of inspection, mandatory verification protocols, acceptance criteria, documentation deliverables, and root cause mitigation strategies.
Governing International Engineering Codes & Specifications
Verification and validation of What Is The Weld Destructive Testing must strictly conform to the latest editions of the following international engineering codes and project specifications:
• **Primary Standard Reference:** ASME Section IX, AWS D1.1, EN ISO 15614
• **Quality Management & Inspection Systems:** ISO 9001:2015 & ISO/IEC 17020 (Requirements for the operation of various types of bodies performing inspection)
• **Material Compliance & Traceability:** EN 10204 Type 3.1 / 3.2 Inspection Certificates for metallic and non-metallic pressure-retaining components
• **Personnel Qualification:** ASNT SNT-TC-1A / ISO 9712 for NDT personnel, CSWIP 3.1 / AWS CWI for welding inspection, and NACE / AMPP Level 2/3 for coating and corrosion personnel
• **Statutory & Health Safety Directives:** ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC), API Standards, OSHA, and regional local authority regulations.
Step-by-Step Quality Control & Inspection Procedure
The execution of quality surveillance for What Is The Weld Destructive Testing is structured across four progressive QA/QC intervention phases:
Stage 1: Pre-Inspection & Engineering Document Review (Review Point – R)
Prior to commencement of any physical activities or manufacturing operations related to What Is The Weld Destructive Testing, the contractor or vendor must submit all technical submittals to the Owner or TPI agency for formal review and approval.
- Verification of approved Inspection and Test Plan (ITP) identifying all Hold (H), Witness (W), Review (R), and Surveillance (S) intervention points.
- Cross-examination of Material Test Reports (MTR / Mill Certificates) against standard design specifications (ASME Section IX, AWS D1.1, EN ISO 15614).
- Review and approval of specific Procedure Qualification Records (PQR), Welding Procedure Specifications (WPS), or calibration certificates.
- Verification that all measurement instruments, gauges, and NDT equipment hold valid calibration certificates from ISO/IEC 17025 accredited calibration laboratories (within 6 to 12 months validity).
Stage 2: In-Process Witnessing & Fabrication Control (Witness / Hold Point – W/H)
During the active execution phase, the certified inspector performs physical surveillance to ensure strict adherence to certified drawings, manufacturing procedures, and code tolerances.
- Verification of material traceability (heat number, heat treatment lot, plate number) transferred accurately onto fabricated components.
- Dimensional verification and visual inspection using calibrated gauges, micrometer depth dials, or laser alignment systems.
- Monitoring ambient environmental parameters (relative humidity, dew point, substrate temperature) when applying surface treatments, welding preheat, or pressure testing.
- Witnessing non-destructive examination (RT, UT, MT, PT, PMI) at specified percentages according to project critical rating and code requirements.
Stage 3: Final Acceptance, Pressure/Performance Testing & Marking (Hold Point – H)
The culminating milestone where the fully assembled or completed item is subjected to definitive acceptance tests in the presence of the Owner’s Third-Party Inspector (TPI).
- Execution of pressure proof tests (Hydrostatic at 1.3x to 1.5x MAWP or Pneumatic test) with dual calibrated pressure gauges and temperature recorders.
- Full visual inspection of completed surfaces, welds, protective coatings, and flange contact faces for absence of mechanical damage or code defects.
- Validation of permanent stamping, low-stress die markings, nameplate data verification, and barcoding in strict conformity with project specs.
- Clearing all open punch-list items, non-conformance reports (NCRs), and concession requests prior to issuance of the release note.
Stage 4: Packing, Preservation & Inspection Release (Inspection Release Certificate – IRC)
Ensuring the inspected equipment is adequately protected against atmospheric corrosion, mechanical shock, and marine transit degradation.
- Inspection of rust preventative coatings, desiccant bags, flange face blind protectors, and vapor corrosion inhibitor (VCI) packaging.
- Verification of heavy-lift sea fastening lugs, center-of-gravity markings, and export crating compliance (ISPM 15 wooden crating).
- Compilation and signing of the final Inspection Release Certificate (IRC / Shipping Release) and manufacturer data dossier (MDR).
Technical Acceptance Criteria & Tolerances Matrix
All measurements and physical characteristics must comply with the engineering tolerances and acceptance thresholds tabulated below:
| Welding Variable / Test Item | Governing Code (ASME Sec IX / AWS) | Permissible Tolerance / Requirement | Test Method / Verification | QC Intervention |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P-Number & Group Number Verification | ASME Sec IX QW-420 | Base metal must strictly match qualified P-Number/Group Number on PQR | MTR Chemical Analysis & Positive Material Identification (PMI) | Review (R) |
| F-Number & A-Number Filler Metal Control | ASME Sec IX QW-430 & QW-440 | Filler rod/wire must match certified AWS classification with heat/lot batch certs | Batch Test Certificate & Oven Storage Temperature Check (>120°C) | Witness (W) |
| WPS Essential Variables Tolerances | ASME Sec IX QW-250 to QW-265 | Current/Voltage ±10%, Travel speed ±10%, Heat input within qualified maximum J/mm | Calibrated Digital Clamp Meter & Heat Input Calculation | Surveillance (S) |
| Preheat & Interpass Temperature | ASME Sec IX / ASME B31.3 | Preheat maintained at min specified temp 75mm on each side; max interpass not exceeded | Tempilstik (Temperature crayon) / Calibrated Contact Pyrometer | Witness (W) |
| Post-Weld Heat Treatment (PWHT) | ASME Sec VIII Div 1 UCS-56 | Heating rate, soaking time (1 hr per 25mm), and cooling rate within strict code graph | Thermocouple placement & Multi-channel Temperature Recorder Chart | Hold (H) |
| Tensile & Guided Bend Mechanical Tests | ASME Sec IX QW-150 / QW-160 | Tensile strength not lower than base metal min specified; bend specimens: zero open flaw >3.2mm | Destructive Lab Testing (Accredited ISO 17025 Lab) | Hold (H) |
Mandatory QA/QC Dossier & Inspection Deliverables
Prior to the final issuance of the Inspection Release Certificate (IRC), the contractor and vendor must compile and submit the verified manufacturer data record containing:
- Approved Inspection & Test Plan (ITP) with sign-off stamps by Contractor, Client, and TPI.
- Material Test Reports (MTR / Mill Test Certificates EN 10204 Type 3.1 or 3.2).
- Certified Welding Procedure Specifications (WPS), Procedure Qualification Records (PQR), and Welder Performance Qualifications (WPQ).
- Calibration Certificates for all test instruments and measuring equipment (NABL / ISO 17025 accredited).
- Non-Destructive Examination Reports (RT, UT, MT, PT, PMI, Ferrite Content) evaluated by Level II/III inspectors.
- Heat Treatment & PWHT Time-Temperature Recorder Charts with thermocouple layout drawings.
- Hydrostatic / Pneumatic Pressure Proof Test Certificate with calibrated chart recorder logs.
- Surface Preparation and Protective Coating Inspection Reports (Daily environmental log, blast profile, DFT summary).
- Non-Conformance Report (NCR) and Concession Disposition Closeout Log.
- Official Inspection Release Certificate (IRC / Shipping Release Note) permitting packing and dispatch.
Common Non-Conformances & Field Mitigation Strategies
Based on extensive third-party inspection field records in oil & gas projects, the following deviations require heightened surveillance:
Defect / Hazard: Material Grade Substitution & Lack of Heat Traceability
Root Cause: Uncontrolled workshop storage, missing color coding, or unverified supplier sub-tier procurement without EN 10204 3.1 documentation.
Preventative Action: Enforce strict 100% Positive Material Identification (PMI) prior to cutting, and mandatory material receiving inspection with physical stamping cross-referenced to original mill test certificates.
Defect / Hazard: Out-of-Tolerance Fit-Up & Alignment Mismatch
Root Cause: Poor thermal cutting, thermal distortion from excessive preheat, or inadequate jigging and tacking arrangements.
Preventative Action: Establish a mandatory Witness/Hold point at joint fit-up before root pass deposition. Use calibrated Hi-Lo gauges to verify bevel angle, root face, and root gap according to the qualified WPS.
Defect / Hazard: Premature Coating Delamination & Blistering Under Film
Root Cause: Excessive soluble salt contamination (>20 mg/m²) left on the substrate, blast cleaning below dew point (<3°C above dew point), or oil/moisture in the blasting compressor air line.
Preventative Action: Perform Blotter Test (ASTM D4285) daily on compressed air, enforce Bresle patch chloride testing, and apply primer within 4 hours of abrasive blasting before rust blooming initiates.
Defect / Hazard: Pressure Drop During Final Hydrostatic Proof Testing
Root Cause: Micro-leakage through temporary test flange gaskets, entrapped air pockets inside vessel high points, or inadequate temperature stabilization.
Preventative Action: Ensure thorough venting at all high-point vents until bubble-free fluid emerges, allow minimum 15-minute temperature stabilization between filling medium and ambient metal, and torque all blind flanges with calibrated torque wrenches.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: What are the mandatory qualifications for inspectors verifying What Is The Weld Destructive Testing?
A: Inspectors must hold recognized international certifications applicable to the discipline. For welding and fabrication: CSWIP 3.1/3.2, AWS CWI, or API 510/570 Source Inspector. For NDT: ISO 9712 or ASNT SNT-TC-1A Level II minimum. For coatings: NACE / AMPP Level 2 or FROSIO Level III. Additionally, the inspection agency must operate under an ISO/IEC 17020 accredited quality management system.
Q: How does PtroTek resolve non-conformances (NCRs) encountered during vendor surveillance?
A: When a deviation from certified drawings or ASME Section IX, AWS D1.1, EN ISO 15614 is detected, the inspector issues a formal Non-Conformance Report (NCR) within 24 hours. The vendor must submit a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and proposed disposition (Rework, Repair, or Concession). Work on the affected component is halted (Hold Point) until the Owner’s engineering authority approves the disposition and a re-inspection confirms full compliance.
Q: What is the difference between Witness (W) and Hold (H) points in an Inspection & Test Plan (ITP)?
A: A Hold Point (H) is a mandatory milestone where fabrication or testing CANNOT proceed without the physical presence of the designated client or third-party inspector. Written clearance or stamping is strictly required. A Witness Point (W) requires prior notification (typically 24 to 48 hours) to the inspector; however, if the inspector fails to attend at the scheduled time, fabrication or testing may proceed with subsequent review of the test records.
Q: Can international clients review inspection reports and photos in real time?
A: Yes. PtroTek provides comprehensive Flash Reports issued within 24 hours of inspection completion, followed by detailed formal inspection reports accompanied by high-resolution calibrated photographic evidence, dimension logs, and signed vendor test records for complete global transparency.
Need Certified Third-Party Inspection (TPI) Support?
PtroTek provides international vendor surveillance, ASME code vessel inspection, welding QA/QC, and protective coating verification across Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and global fabrication hubs.