Ptrotek | Industrial Services | Inspection Services

We have long experience in oil & gas industry ...

For more info, Contact Us

Our Articles

You can choos our articles from menu in below …

The ASME Impact Test Requirement article provides you with information about impact test requirements in pressure vessel design and construction.

Let’s say, you have a pressure vessel under design, process and construction has not started yet.

Based on the ASME impact test requirement, you need to make assessment to see that either your pressure vessel is exempted from impact testing, or you need to carry out the test.

There are 4 steps for impact test exemption assessment. You need to know these steps. You might be exempted in the first, second or third steps and might not be exempted even in step 4.

So if you are in step 4 and you have not exempted, then you need to carry out the test. I will explain the process for exemption in this article.

Basic Concept:

You may know carbon steels and low alloy steels exhibit a drastic change in their room temperature ductility at sub-zero service temperatures. Different types of materials exhibit different types of transition behavior.

We can see there is a sudden, phenomenal drop in their notch-toughness properties below the “transition” range of temperature, which should be a matter of concern for us.

Body centered cubic or Ferritic alloys exhibit a significant transition in behavior when impact tested over a range of temperatures. Above transition temperature range, impact specimens fracture in a “ductile” manner, absorbing relatively large amounts of energy.

asme impact test requirement

At lower temperatures, i.e. below the transition temperature range, the impact test specimens are found to fracture in a brittle (cleavage) manner, absorbing less energy.

And within the transition temperature range, the fracture is a mixture of ductile and brittle nature.

A material would be invulnerable to a sudden drop in notch-toughness at the lowest specified service (or design) temperature, if it is proved by conducting Charpy V-notch Impact tests on representative test samples, at reference (the lowest service) temperature.

Grain refined carbon steel forgings and wrought materials (thoroughly worked and normalized) generally exhibit good notch toughness.

ASME Code Section VIII Div 1 exemption rules for ASME Impact Test Requirement:

There are specific rules in ASME Code for exemption from ASME Impact Test Requirement. This test is very expensive, so pressure vessel manufacturers are trying to be exempted for this costly test.

You need to follow the following clauses to make exemption assessment for ASME impact test requirement:

UG-20(f) →→→UCS-66(a) →→→ UCS-66(b) →→→UCS-68(c)

First you have to keep your pressure vessel design data available and then refer to UG-20 (f). If you are exempted from this clause, you do not need proceed further.

But if you are not exempted by UG-20 (f), you have to proceed to UCS-66(a), but again if you are exempted, there is no need for more assessment.

But if not, you have to proceed to UCS-66(b). If you are exempted now, there is no need for more assessment; otherwise, you have to proceed to UCS-68(c), and again if you are still not exempted, you have to carry out impact testing.

For some cases, You might be exempted from the ASME impact test requirement in the first stage in UG-20 (f). In others, You might be exempted in UCS-66(a) or UCS-66(b) or UCS-68(c). If you are not exempted, you must prepare yourself for doing this costly test.

This test would be more costly out of the US because of Laboratory Accreditation requirements. Also, there are fewer accredited labs in Europe and the Middle East, and their price is high as well.

UG-20(f)

We will start with UG-20(f) for the ASME impact test requirement. If your MOC (Material of Construction) is categorized in P-No. 1 or 2 (Refer to ASME Code Section IX for P-No Definition) and your MOC thickness has the limited value defined in this clause, then you might be exempted from impact testing.

But you need to refer to Fig UCS-66 in ASME Code Section VIII Div 1 and see in which A, B, C or D curves your MOC is listed. All ASME carbon steel and low alloy steel material is distributed in these 4 groups (Curves) of materials.

You need to know that the materials listed in curve D have the best toughness property, better than the materials listed in curve C. Similarly materials listed in curve C have better toughness properties compared to materials listed in curve B and materials listed in Curve B have better toughness than materials listed in Curve A .

See Following Fig UCS-66(a):

asme impact test requirement

When you determine your MOC curve, then you have to review UG-20(f) and look for the possibility of exemption from the ASME impact test requirement. There are some other conditions in this clause, which you should consider for exemption.

For instance, the vessel should be hydrostatically tested after completion, and the thermal and mechanical loading can not be a design controlling factor.

For example, if your MOC is a normalized SA 516 Gr.70 with 0.75 inch thickness you will be exempted from ASME impact test requirement.

Your thickness, in this example, is 0.75 of an inch, and is listed in curve D which is up to 1 inch, you are exempted by this clause. Of course, you will be carry out hydro-static test and ensure that the mentioned loadings are not a design controlling factor in your considered pressure vessel.

UCS-66(a)

So assume that in the above example, your MOC thickness is 1.125 inch instead of 1 inch, you will not be exempted by UG-20(f) and you have to refer to UCS-66(a);

But for assessment, based on this clause, you need to know your pressure vessel MDMT (Minimum Design Metal Temperature). Assume that is -20 degree F, so you should now go to Fig. UCS-66 and locate 1.125 inch in the horizontal axis and draw a vertical line.

In a similar way, locate -20 degree F in the vertical axes and draw a horizontal line. These two lines will cross each other.

See above Figure, the lines are identified in red.

If the cross point falls above the curve D (because your MOC is listed in curve D) you are exempted. Otherwise you are not, but for the current example, you are above the curve D so you are exempted from impact testing.

To simplify your assessment for the ASME impact test requirement, the Fig-66 has been converted to the table(table UCS-66). For any MOC with specific thickness you can go to this table and see what is the minimum permissible temperature without impact testing.

See following UCS-66(a) Table:

asme impact test requirement

In the above example (normalized SA 516 Gr.70, Curve D, 1.125 inch thickness), the minimum permissible temperature without impact test is -26 degree F. This means that, if in the above example your MDMT changes from -20 degree F to -27 degree F, then you cannot be exempted from the ASME impact test requirement by UCS-66(a), and you have to proceed to UCS-66(b)

UCS-66(b)

Let us explain this clause with the above example. Your MDMT from above is -27 degree F, nominal thickness is 1.125 inch, normalized SA 516 Gr.70 listed in curve D and you are not exempted by UCS-66(a)

So you are here to continue your assessment to find a chance for exemption. You have to refer to Fig UCS-66.1 and calculate the following formula:

Ratio= tr E / (tn –c)

tr is the required design thickness for all applicable loading. We assume for the above example that is 0.95 inch. E is your joint efficiency, and we assume for this vessel it is 1. This means your vessel is RT2, tn is your nominal thinness, which in the example from above it is 1.125 inches, and C is corrosion allowance, and we assume it is 0.125 inches; so let calculate:

Ratio = 0.95×1/(1.125 – 0.125) Ratio= 0.95

See following Fig UCS-66(b):

asme impact test requirement

Then go to the Figure UCS-66(b) and in the vertical axes locate Ratio and draw a horizontal line. Then locate the cross point with the graph and draw a vertical line to cross the horizontal axis.

You will be able to reach a value of 8 in the horizontal axes. This 8, is your 8 degree F bonus from table UCS-66, which you can reduce by 8 degrees F minimum permissible temperature in table without impact testing.

In the above example, your MDMT is -27 degree F, and in the UCS 66 table, the minimum permissible temperature without impact testing designated -26 degree F. So with this clause you can reduce it to -36 degree F(-26 -8 = -34). Your MDMT is -27 degree F, so you are exempted from impact testing with this clause.

UCS-68(c)

Let us change one variable in the above example. Let’s assume you need to have -45 degree F for your MDMT. Other variable are the same; it means normalized SA 516 Gr.70 listed in curve D, thickness 1.125, so you can see you are not exempted by UCS-66(b);

This is because the minimum permissible temperature is -36 degree F, but your MDMT is -45 degree F, so UCS-68(c) might be helpful.

It says that if post weld heat treatment is not a code requirement and your P-No is 1 and you carry out post weld heat treatment, a 30 degree F bonus will be granted to you to reduce the minimum permissible temperature in table UCS-66.

So when post weld heat treatment is code requirement?

It is code requirement when your service is lethal and when your thickness for P-No. 1 is greater than 1.5 inch;

So, for our example, our service is not lethal and our P-No. is 1 and thickness is 1.125 and it is less than 1.5 inch: therefore, post weld heat treatment is not code requirement.

It means if you carry out post heat treatment, a 30 degree F bonus will be granted by this clause. For this example our minimum permissible temperature would be -36-30=-66 degree F, and your MDMT is -45 degree F, so you are exempted from impact testing.

Now the worst case: in the above, assume you need to have -70 degree F for your MDMT; you can see with this new condition you cannot be exempted even by UCS-68(c) and you have to carry out impact testing.

Executive Summary & Industrial Inspection Scope

In demanding industrial environments across Oil, Gas, Petrochemical, Offshore, and Heavy Process Infrastructure, rigorous compliance with ASME BPVC Section VIII Div 1 & 2, Section IX, Section V is essential to ensure operational integrity, personnel safety, and compliance with statutory regulatory frameworks. This technical specification provides QA/QC managers, procurement engineers, welding inspectors, and third-party inspection (TPI) agencies with an authoritative, field-tested guideline for “ASME Impact Test Requirement”.

Ensuring compliance regarding asme impact test requirement minimizes the risk of catastrophic asset failures, costly unscheduled shutdowns, and supplier non-conformances. The following technical sections delineate the scope of inspection, mandatory verification protocols, acceptance criteria, documentation deliverables, and root cause mitigation strategies.

Governing International Engineering Codes & Specifications

Verification and validation of ASME Impact Test Requirement must strictly conform to the latest editions of the following international engineering codes and project specifications:
• **Primary Standard Reference:** ASME BPVC Section VIII Div 1 & 2, Section IX, Section V
• **Quality Management & Inspection Systems:** ISO 9001:2015 & ISO/IEC 17020 (Requirements for the operation of various types of bodies performing inspection)
• **Material Compliance & Traceability:** EN 10204 Type 3.1 / 3.2 Inspection Certificates for metallic and non-metallic pressure-retaining components
• **Personnel Qualification:** ASNT SNT-TC-1A / ISO 9712 for NDT personnel, CSWIP 3.1 / AWS CWI for welding inspection, and NACE / AMPP Level 2/3 for coating and corrosion personnel
• **Statutory & Health Safety Directives:** ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC), API Standards, OSHA, and regional local authority regulations.

Step-by-Step Quality Control & Inspection Procedure

The execution of quality surveillance for ASME Impact Test Requirement is structured across four progressive QA/QC intervention phases:

Stage 1: Pre-Inspection & Engineering Document Review (Review Point – R)

Prior to commencement of any physical activities or manufacturing operations related to ASME Impact Test Requirement, the contractor or vendor must submit all technical submittals to the Owner or TPI agency for formal review and approval.

  • Verification of approved Inspection and Test Plan (ITP) identifying all Hold (H), Witness (W), Review (R), and Surveillance (S) intervention points.
  • Cross-examination of Material Test Reports (MTR / Mill Certificates) against standard design specifications (ASME BPVC Section VIII Div 1 & 2, Section IX, Section V).
  • Review and approval of specific Procedure Qualification Records (PQR), Welding Procedure Specifications (WPS), or calibration certificates.
  • Verification that all measurement instruments, gauges, and NDT equipment hold valid calibration certificates from ISO/IEC 17025 accredited calibration laboratories (within 6 to 12 months validity).

Stage 2: In-Process Witnessing & Fabrication Control (Witness / Hold Point – W/H)

During the active execution phase, the certified inspector performs physical surveillance to ensure strict adherence to certified drawings, manufacturing procedures, and code tolerances.

  • Verification of material traceability (heat number, heat treatment lot, plate number) transferred accurately onto fabricated components.
  • Dimensional verification and visual inspection using calibrated gauges, micrometer depth dials, or laser alignment systems.
  • Monitoring ambient environmental parameters (relative humidity, dew point, substrate temperature) when applying surface treatments, welding preheat, or pressure testing.
  • Witnessing non-destructive examination (RT, UT, MT, PT, PMI) at specified percentages according to project critical rating and code requirements.

Stage 3: Final Acceptance, Pressure/Performance Testing & Marking (Hold Point – H)

The culminating milestone where the fully assembled or completed item is subjected to definitive acceptance tests in the presence of the Owner’s Third-Party Inspector (TPI).

  • Execution of pressure proof tests (Hydrostatic at 1.3x to 1.5x MAWP or Pneumatic test) with dual calibrated pressure gauges and temperature recorders.
  • Full visual inspection of completed surfaces, welds, protective coatings, and flange contact faces for absence of mechanical damage or code defects.
  • Validation of permanent stamping, low-stress die markings, nameplate data verification, and barcoding in strict conformity with project specs.
  • Clearing all open punch-list items, non-conformance reports (NCRs), and concession requests prior to issuance of the release note.

Stage 4: Packing, Preservation & Inspection Release (Inspection Release Certificate – IRC)

Ensuring the inspected equipment is adequately protected against atmospheric corrosion, mechanical shock, and marine transit degradation.

  • Inspection of rust preventative coatings, desiccant bags, flange face blind protectors, and vapor corrosion inhibitor (VCI) packaging.
  • Verification of heavy-lift sea fastening lugs, center-of-gravity markings, and export crating compliance (ISPM 15 wooden crating).
  • Compilation and signing of the final Inspection Release Certificate (IRC / Shipping Release) and manufacturer data dossier (MDR).

Technical Acceptance Criteria & Tolerances Matrix

All measurements and physical characteristics must comply with the engineering tolerances and acceptance thresholds tabulated below:

Pressure Vessel QC Parameter ASME Code Section Permissible Tolerance & Acceptance Criteria Verification Method QC Level
Shell Plate Forming Out-of-Roundness ASME Sec VIII Div 1 UG-80 Max difference between max and min inside diameter (Dmax – Dmin) ≤ 1.0% of nominal ID Internal Trammel Gauge / Laser Sweep Alignment Witness (W)
Head Forming Profile & Peaking ASME Sec VIII Div 1 UG-81 Formed torispherical / 2:1 ellipsoidal head profile shall not deviate by more than +1.25% / -0.625% Radial Profile Wooden Template / Contour Gauge Witness (W)
Weld Seam Alignment Offset (Mismatch) ASME Sec VIII Div 1 UW-33 Longitudinal seams offset ≤ 1.6mm (for t ≤ 13mm); Circumferential joints per UW-33 table Bridge Cam / Hi-Lo Welding Gauge Hold (H)
Full / Spot Radiographic Examination (RT) ASME Sec VIII Div 1 UW-51 / UW-52 Full RT: zero cracks, lack of fusion/penetration; Spot RT: per UW-52 evaluation rules Gamma Ray (Ir-192) / X-Ray with Densitometer and Film Viewer Hold (H)
Hydrostatic Test Pressure & Hold Time ASME Sec VIII Div 1 UG-99(b) Pt = 1.3 × MAWP × (S_test / S_design); Min 30 min hold; zero drop on calibrated digital gauge Certified Dual Pressure Gauges + Calibrated Temperature Recorder Hold (H)
Nameplate Stamping & Manufacturer Data (U-1A) ASME Sec VIII Div 1 UG-115 to UG-120 ASME “U” or “U2” stamp, National Board number, serial number, and authorized inspector signature Visual review and Authorized Inspector (AI) sign-off Hold (H)

Mandatory QA/QC Dossier & Inspection Deliverables

Prior to the final issuance of the Inspection Release Certificate (IRC), the contractor and vendor must compile and submit the verified manufacturer data record containing:

  • Approved Inspection & Test Plan (ITP) with sign-off stamps by Contractor, Client, and TPI.
  • Material Test Reports (MTR / Mill Test Certificates EN 10204 Type 3.1 or 3.2).
  • Certified Welding Procedure Specifications (WPS), Procedure Qualification Records (PQR), and Welder Performance Qualifications (WPQ).
  • Calibration Certificates for all test instruments and measuring equipment (NABL / ISO 17025 accredited).
  • Non-Destructive Examination Reports (RT, UT, MT, PT, PMI, Ferrite Content) evaluated by Level II/III inspectors.
  • Heat Treatment & PWHT Time-Temperature Recorder Charts with thermocouple layout drawings.
  • Hydrostatic / Pneumatic Pressure Proof Test Certificate with calibrated chart recorder logs.
  • Surface Preparation and Protective Coating Inspection Reports (Daily environmental log, blast profile, DFT summary).
  • Non-Conformance Report (NCR) and Concession Disposition Closeout Log.
  • Official Inspection Release Certificate (IRC / Shipping Release Note) permitting packing and dispatch.

Common Non-Conformances & Field Mitigation Strategies

Based on extensive third-party inspection field records in oil & gas projects, the following deviations require heightened surveillance:

Defect / Hazard: Material Grade Substitution & Lack of Heat Traceability

Root Cause: Uncontrolled workshop storage, missing color coding, or unverified supplier sub-tier procurement without EN 10204 3.1 documentation.

Preventative Action: Enforce strict 100% Positive Material Identification (PMI) prior to cutting, and mandatory material receiving inspection with physical stamping cross-referenced to original mill test certificates.

Defect / Hazard: Out-of-Tolerance Fit-Up & Alignment Mismatch

Root Cause: Poor thermal cutting, thermal distortion from excessive preheat, or inadequate jigging and tacking arrangements.

Preventative Action: Establish a mandatory Witness/Hold point at joint fit-up before root pass deposition. Use calibrated Hi-Lo gauges to verify bevel angle, root face, and root gap according to the qualified WPS.

Defect / Hazard: Premature Coating Delamination & Blistering Under Film

Root Cause: Excessive soluble salt contamination (>20 mg/m²) left on the substrate, blast cleaning below dew point (<3°C above dew point), or oil/moisture in the blasting compressor air line.

Preventative Action: Perform Blotter Test (ASTM D4285) daily on compressed air, enforce Bresle patch chloride testing, and apply primer within 4 hours of abrasive blasting before rust blooming initiates.

Defect / Hazard: Pressure Drop During Final Hydrostatic Proof Testing

Root Cause: Micro-leakage through temporary test flange gaskets, entrapped air pockets inside vessel high points, or inadequate temperature stabilization.

Preventative Action: Ensure thorough venting at all high-point vents until bubble-free fluid emerges, allow minimum 15-minute temperature stabilization between filling medium and ambient metal, and torque all blind flanges with calibrated torque wrenches.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: What are the mandatory qualifications for inspectors verifying ASME Impact Test Requirement?

A: Inspectors must hold recognized international certifications applicable to the discipline. For welding and fabrication: CSWIP 3.1/3.2, AWS CWI, or API 510/570 Source Inspector. For NDT: ISO 9712 or ASNT SNT-TC-1A Level II minimum. For coatings: NACE / AMPP Level 2 or FROSIO Level III. Additionally, the inspection agency must operate under an ISO/IEC 17020 accredited quality management system.

Q: How does PtroTek resolve non-conformances (NCRs) encountered during vendor surveillance?

A: When a deviation from certified drawings or ASME BPVC Section VIII Div 1 & 2, Section IX, Section V is detected, the inspector issues a formal Non-Conformance Report (NCR) within 24 hours. The vendor must submit a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and proposed disposition (Rework, Repair, or Concession). Work on the affected component is halted (Hold Point) until the Owner’s engineering authority approves the disposition and a re-inspection confirms full compliance.

Q: What is the difference between Witness (W) and Hold (H) points in an Inspection & Test Plan (ITP)?

A: A Hold Point (H) is a mandatory milestone where fabrication or testing CANNOT proceed without the physical presence of the designated client or third-party inspector. Written clearance or stamping is strictly required. A Witness Point (W) requires prior notification (typically 24 to 48 hours) to the inspector; however, if the inspector fails to attend at the scheduled time, fabrication or testing may proceed with subsequent review of the test records.

Q: Can international clients review inspection reports and photos in real time?

A: Yes. PtroTek provides comprehensive Flash Reports issued within 24 hours of inspection completion, followed by detailed formal inspection reports accompanied by high-resolution calibrated photographic evidence, dimension logs, and signed vendor test records for complete global transparency.

Need Certified Third-Party Inspection (TPI) Support?

PtroTek provides international vendor surveillance, ASME code vessel inspection, welding QA/QC, and protective coating verification across Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and global fabrication hubs.

Request a Technical Inspection Quote