Ptrotek | Industrial Services | Inspection Services

We have long experience in oil & gas industry ...

For more info, Contact Us

Our Articles

You can choos our articles from menu in below …

The shop inspection or vendor inspection article provides you with information about the second party or third party inspection process in manufacturing shops. This article also provides lots of other links for shop inspection practices for each equipment type.

Assume an oil company orders manufacturing of several pumps from a pump manufacturer.

So there will be a proforma invoice (PI) and a purchase order (PO). The PI is issued by the pump manufacturer, with detailed pump specifications and prices, and at the same time, a PO will be issued by the oil company, which stats its agreement with the specifications, prices, and ordering for the manufacturing of the pumps.

PI and PO are important commercial documents.

Before the start of the manufacturing process, the oil company will agree with the pump manufacturer for the inspection process. Normally, this process will be done based on the agreed upon inspection and test plan.

For more details, review the Inspection and Test Plan article.

In this important document, the inspection “hold” and “witness” points will be determined, and it will be necessary for the pump manufacturer to notify the oil company inspector for such inspection in advance.

Assume the “inspection and test plan” determine 5 inspection points in the manufacturing process, such as material certificate review and identification, casing hydro static testing, impeller balancing, performance test and run-out test.

So when the manufacturer reaches to these points, it must notify the oil company inspector (in advance) to come for the inspection and testing. Finally, if the result of inspection visits were satisfactory, then the inspector will issue the inspection release note.

This oil company has several options to designate an inspector as follows:

  • Ordering this inspection from the inspection agency, which is called third party inspection,
  • Or dispatching its own competent inspector’s shop, which is called second party inspection.
  • It might be that there is not a direct contract between the oil company and the manufacturer, and the contract is between the oil company and the engineering company. The engineering company will make a contract with the pump manufacturer, so the engineering company is responsible for the inspection. If the engineering company uses its own inspector, it will be similar to the second party inspector, and if he hires the inspection agency, it will be a third party inspector.

Please note that most of the clients such as this oil company mandate the engineering company to hire a third party inspection agency.

shop inspection

Using the “inspector” wording for the engineering company’s personnel and the name of inspection department in the engineering company are not correct. They must be called the and must be quality control department. But some engineering companies call their quality control department an inspection department.

Inspector can only be used for someone who is the purchaser’s employee or the purchaser’s designated person working in the inspection agency.

When the inspection is carried out in the manufacturing shop, it is called shop inspection.

The 3rd Party Shop Inspection article provides you some more supplementary information regarding this subject.

Executive Summary & Industrial Inspection Scope

In demanding industrial environments across Oil, Gas, Petrochemical, Offshore, and Heavy Process Infrastructure, rigorous compliance with ISO 17020, API Source Inspector, ASME is essential to ensure operational integrity, personnel safety, and compliance with statutory regulatory frameworks. This technical specification provides QA/QC managers, procurement engineers, welding inspectors, and third-party inspection (TPI) agencies with an authoritative, field-tested guideline for “Shop Inspection”.

Ensuring compliance regarding shop inspection services minimizes the risk of catastrophic asset failures, costly unscheduled shutdowns, and supplier non-conformances. The following technical sections delineate the scope of inspection, mandatory verification protocols, acceptance criteria, documentation deliverables, and root cause mitigation strategies.

Governing International Engineering Codes & Specifications

Verification and validation of Shop Inspection must strictly conform to the latest editions of the following international engineering codes and project specifications:
• **Primary Standard Reference:** ISO 17020, API Source Inspector, ASME
• **Quality Management & Inspection Systems:** ISO 9001:2015 & ISO/IEC 17020 (Requirements for the operation of various types of bodies performing inspection)
• **Material Compliance & Traceability:** EN 10204 Type 3.1 / 3.2 Inspection Certificates for metallic and non-metallic pressure-retaining components
• **Personnel Qualification:** ASNT SNT-TC-1A / ISO 9712 for NDT personnel, CSWIP 3.1 / AWS CWI for welding inspection, and NACE / AMPP Level 2/3 for coating and corrosion personnel
• **Statutory & Health Safety Directives:** ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC), API Standards, OSHA, and regional local authority regulations.

Step-by-Step Quality Control & Inspection Procedure

The execution of quality surveillance for Shop Inspection is structured across four progressive QA/QC intervention phases:

Stage 1: Pre-Inspection & Engineering Document Review (Review Point – R)

Prior to commencement of any physical activities or manufacturing operations related to Shop Inspection, the contractor or vendor must submit all technical submittals to the Owner or TPI agency for formal review and approval.

  • Verification of approved Inspection and Test Plan (ITP) identifying all Hold (H), Witness (W), Review (R), and Surveillance (S) intervention points.
  • Cross-examination of Material Test Reports (MTR / Mill Certificates) against standard design specifications (ISO 17020, API Source Inspector, ASME).
  • Review and approval of specific Procedure Qualification Records (PQR), Welding Procedure Specifications (WPS), or calibration certificates.
  • Verification that all measurement instruments, gauges, and NDT equipment hold valid calibration certificates from ISO/IEC 17025 accredited calibration laboratories (within 6 to 12 months validity).

Stage 2: In-Process Witnessing & Fabrication Control (Witness / Hold Point – W/H)

During the active execution phase, the certified inspector performs physical surveillance to ensure strict adherence to certified drawings, manufacturing procedures, and code tolerances.

  • Verification of material traceability (heat number, heat treatment lot, plate number) transferred accurately onto fabricated components.
  • Dimensional verification and visual inspection using calibrated gauges, micrometer depth dials, or laser alignment systems.
  • Monitoring ambient environmental parameters (relative humidity, dew point, substrate temperature) when applying surface treatments, welding preheat, or pressure testing.
  • Witnessing non-destructive examination (RT, UT, MT, PT, PMI) at specified percentages according to project critical rating and code requirements.

Stage 3: Final Acceptance, Pressure/Performance Testing & Marking (Hold Point – H)

The culminating milestone where the fully assembled or completed item is subjected to definitive acceptance tests in the presence of the Owner’s Third-Party Inspector (TPI).

  • Execution of pressure proof tests (Hydrostatic at 1.3x to 1.5x MAWP or Pneumatic test) with dual calibrated pressure gauges and temperature recorders.
  • Full visual inspection of completed surfaces, welds, protective coatings, and flange contact faces for absence of mechanical damage or code defects.
  • Validation of permanent stamping, low-stress die markings, nameplate data verification, and barcoding in strict conformity with project specs.
  • Clearing all open punch-list items, non-conformance reports (NCRs), and concession requests prior to issuance of the release note.

Stage 4: Packing, Preservation & Inspection Release (Inspection Release Certificate – IRC)

Ensuring the inspected equipment is adequately protected against atmospheric corrosion, mechanical shock, and marine transit degradation.

  • Inspection of rust preventative coatings, desiccant bags, flange face blind protectors, and vapor corrosion inhibitor (VCI) packaging.
  • Verification of heavy-lift sea fastening lugs, center-of-gravity markings, and export crating compliance (ISPM 15 wooden crating).
  • Compilation and signing of the final Inspection Release Certificate (IRC / Shipping Release) and manufacturer data dossier (MDR).

Technical Acceptance Criteria & Tolerances Matrix

All measurements and physical characteristics must comply with the engineering tolerances and acceptance thresholds tabulated below:

Inspection Parameter / Test Item Applicable Standard & Clause Permissible Tolerance / Acceptance Limit Verification Method Intervention Type
Material Chemical & Mechanical Verification ISO 17020, API Source Inspector, ASME / EN 10204 3.1 100% compliance with minimum tensile, yield, elongation, and impact values (Charpy V-Notch at design temp) Optical Emission Spectrometry (OES) / MTR Verification Review (R)
Visual & Dimensional Tolerances ISO 17020, API Source Inspector, ASME / Project Specs Zero cracks, lack of fusion, severe pitting; dimensional tolerances within ±1.0mm to ±3.0mm per code drawings Calibrated Vernier, Bridge Cam, Depth Micrometer Witness (W)
Non-Destructive Examination (NDT) ASME Sec V / ASNT SNT-TC-1A 100% compliant with code acceptance criteria; zero planar defects or unpermitted volumetric indications Radiographic (RT) / Ultrasonic (UT) / Magnetic Particle (MT) Hold (H)
Pressure / Proof Testing (Hydrostatic) ISO 17020, API Source Inspector, ASME / ASME Sec VIII Test pressure maintained for minimum 30 to 60 mins; zero pressure drop, zero leakage or visible sweating Dual calibrated Bourdon pressure gauges + Chart Recorder Hold (H)
Surface Prep & Protective Coating Quality SSPC-SP / NACE / ISO 8501 Surface profile 50 – 75 µm; Dry Film Thickness (DFT) within 80/20 rule of specified nominal thickness Replica Tape (ASTM D4417) & Magnetic Gauge (SSPC-PA 2) Witness (W)
Nameplate & Final Preservation Verification API / ASME / Client Specs 316L SS nameplate securely affixed with correct design code, MAWP, design temp, and national board stamping Physical visual check & VCI preservation verification Hold (H)

Mandatory QA/QC Dossier & Inspection Deliverables

Prior to the final issuance of the Inspection Release Certificate (IRC), the contractor and vendor must compile and submit the verified manufacturer data record containing:

  • Approved Inspection & Test Plan (ITP) with sign-off stamps by Contractor, Client, and TPI.
  • Material Test Reports (MTR / Mill Test Certificates EN 10204 Type 3.1 or 3.2).
  • Certified Welding Procedure Specifications (WPS), Procedure Qualification Records (PQR), and Welder Performance Qualifications (WPQ).
  • Calibration Certificates for all test instruments and measuring equipment (NABL / ISO 17025 accredited).
  • Non-Destructive Examination Reports (RT, UT, MT, PT, PMI, Ferrite Content) evaluated by Level II/III inspectors.
  • Heat Treatment & PWHT Time-Temperature Recorder Charts with thermocouple layout drawings.
  • Hydrostatic / Pneumatic Pressure Proof Test Certificate with calibrated chart recorder logs.
  • Surface Preparation and Protective Coating Inspection Reports (Daily environmental log, blast profile, DFT summary).
  • Non-Conformance Report (NCR) and Concession Disposition Closeout Log.
  • Official Inspection Release Certificate (IRC / Shipping Release Note) permitting packing and dispatch.

Common Non-Conformances & Field Mitigation Strategies

Based on extensive third-party inspection field records in oil & gas projects, the following deviations require heightened surveillance:

Defect / Hazard: Material Grade Substitution & Lack of Heat Traceability

Root Cause: Uncontrolled workshop storage, missing color coding, or unverified supplier sub-tier procurement without EN 10204 3.1 documentation.

Preventative Action: Enforce strict 100% Positive Material Identification (PMI) prior to cutting, and mandatory material receiving inspection with physical stamping cross-referenced to original mill test certificates.

Defect / Hazard: Out-of-Tolerance Fit-Up & Alignment Mismatch

Root Cause: Poor thermal cutting, thermal distortion from excessive preheat, or inadequate jigging and tacking arrangements.

Preventative Action: Establish a mandatory Witness/Hold point at joint fit-up before root pass deposition. Use calibrated Hi-Lo gauges to verify bevel angle, root face, and root gap according to the qualified WPS.

Defect / Hazard: Premature Coating Delamination & Blistering Under Film

Root Cause: Excessive soluble salt contamination (>20 mg/m²) left on the substrate, blast cleaning below dew point (<3°C above dew point), or oil/moisture in the blasting compressor air line.

Preventative Action: Perform Blotter Test (ASTM D4285) daily on compressed air, enforce Bresle patch chloride testing, and apply primer within 4 hours of abrasive blasting before rust blooming initiates.

Defect / Hazard: Pressure Drop During Final Hydrostatic Proof Testing

Root Cause: Micro-leakage through temporary test flange gaskets, entrapped air pockets inside vessel high points, or inadequate temperature stabilization.

Preventative Action: Ensure thorough venting at all high-point vents until bubble-free fluid emerges, allow minimum 15-minute temperature stabilization between filling medium and ambient metal, and torque all blind flanges with calibrated torque wrenches.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: What are the mandatory qualifications for inspectors verifying Shop Inspection?

A: Inspectors must hold recognized international certifications applicable to the discipline. For welding and fabrication: CSWIP 3.1/3.2, AWS CWI, or API 510/570 Source Inspector. For NDT: ISO 9712 or ASNT SNT-TC-1A Level II minimum. For coatings: NACE / AMPP Level 2 or FROSIO Level III. Additionally, the inspection agency must operate under an ISO/IEC 17020 accredited quality management system.

Q: How does PtroTek resolve non-conformances (NCRs) encountered during vendor surveillance?

A: When a deviation from certified drawings or ISO 17020, API Source Inspector, ASME is detected, the inspector issues a formal Non-Conformance Report (NCR) within 24 hours. The vendor must submit a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and proposed disposition (Rework, Repair, or Concession). Work on the affected component is halted (Hold Point) until the Owner’s engineering authority approves the disposition and a re-inspection confirms full compliance.

Q: What is the difference between Witness (W) and Hold (H) points in an Inspection & Test Plan (ITP)?

A: A Hold Point (H) is a mandatory milestone where fabrication or testing CANNOT proceed without the physical presence of the designated client or third-party inspector. Written clearance or stamping is strictly required. A Witness Point (W) requires prior notification (typically 24 to 48 hours) to the inspector; however, if the inspector fails to attend at the scheduled time, fabrication or testing may proceed with subsequent review of the test records.

Q: Can international clients review inspection reports and photos in real time?

A: Yes. PtroTek provides comprehensive Flash Reports issued within 24 hours of inspection completion, followed by detailed formal inspection reports accompanied by high-resolution calibrated photographic evidence, dimension logs, and signed vendor test records for complete global transparency.

Need Certified Third-Party Inspection (TPI) Support?

PtroTek provides international vendor surveillance, ASME code vessel inspection, welding QA/QC, and protective coating verification across Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and global fabrication hubs.

Request a Technical Inspection Quote