Ptrotek | Industrial Services | Inspection Services

We have long experience in oil & gas industry ...

For more info, Contact Us

Our Articles

You can choos our articles from menu in below …

The centrifugal pump performance test is conducted by pump manufacturer after completion of the assembly to prove the pump has the required specification as indicated in the pump datasheet and other purchase documents.

The performance test is conducted after completion of casing inspection, casing hydrostatic test, impeller, and rotor dynamic balancing. The NPSH test, mechanical running test, and final inspection are done after performance test. The vibration testing is carried out during performance test and mechanical running test. You may also want to review a general centrifugal pump inspection and test procedure. 

Let explain the performance test by an example. You are attending to the pump manufacturer shop to witness a centrifugal pump performance test which is a hold point on the pump ITP. You review the pump approved datasheet and find following information: 

Rate flow = 238.5 m³/h (1050.08 Gal/Min)

Rated Differential Head = 2690.28 m (8826.37 feet)

Rated Power = 2985 KW (4003 HP)

Rated Efficiency = 68 %

Upon completion of the centrifugal pump performance test, the pump manufacturer provides you following performance curve. You need to match this curve with datasheet specification to make sure the pump passed the performance test. 

Let’s start with head-capacity curve, we draw a verticle line at 238.5 (in the horizontal axis), and it will cross head-capacity curve, then we draw a horizontal line from the cross point, and it crosses the vertical axis at 2640. So the measured head at the 238.5 m³/h is 2640 meter. 

What was expected value in the datasheet? It was 2690.28 m but the test result was 2640 m. 

What is the test result ( the head almost is 50.28 meters less than required value)? The pump outperforming or underperforming?

The API 610 at table 18 says the head can be +/- 3% of the rated value. The 3 % of the rated value (2690.28 x 3%) would be 80.7 which is greater than 50.28, the pump underperforming but the test result is acceptable. 

Let’s assess the power consumption; we repeat the same process but this time with the power curve. The curve indicates the consumed power at 238.5 m³/h is 2600KW (power consumption was provided at the left side of the vertical axis). Compare 2600 KW with datasheet value which is 2985 KW.  

Obviously, the pump outperforming since consumes less power. However, API 610 acceptance range is 4% it means the pump test result would be satisfactory even if consumes more than 4 % from what indicated in the datasheet. 

We also need to check the efficiency. The minimum efficiency in the approved datasheet is 68 %. Check the efficiency curve, the efficiency amount at the  238.5 m³/h is 70%. So the pump is outperforming and gives higher efficiency than what required in the datasheet. 

So the result of the centrifugal pump performance test for the differential head, power consumption, and efficiency is satisfactory.

The head value also shall be checked in shut off point but since this pump is high energy pump, the centrifugal pump performance test at the shut-off point (no flow at discharge valve) is not a requirement based on API 610.

The above example was a simplified example. The pump manufacturers usually provide a tabulated format to make it easy for review.

The manufacturers also simulate the test result to actual field condition. The pump might be designed for crude oil, but in the shop will be tested by the water. In such cases, the attained values will be converted to field condition by engineering calculation. 

Subsequently, you need to check bearing housing and shaft vibration FFT spectrum (Plot) at each data point from minimum to maximum flow to ensure the vibration values are within acceptance range.

The Pump NPSH Test (Net Positive Suction Heat Test) report also shall be verified against approved datasheet values. 

The pump mechanical running test is performed after successful completion of performance and NPSH test. 

Now let deepen in the centrifugal pump performance test by the understanding of flowrate, total head, power, and efficiency. 

What is the Flowrate and Head in Centrifugal Pump Performance Test?

Volume flow rate (Q), also referred to as capacity, is the volume of liquid that travels through the pump in a given time (measured in gallons per minute or GPM). 

It defines the rate at which a pump can push fluid through the system. Flowrate is the first parameter specified by the process designer, who determines the pump requirement on the flowrate that the process needs to function. 

This ‘rated’ flowrate is normally expressed in volume terms, and it is represented by the symbol q, with units of cubic meters/ second or GPM. 

The static head of a pump is the maximum height (pressure) it can deliver. The capability of the pump at a certain RPM can be obtained from its Q-H curve.

The pump manufacturers are interested in providing pump performance curve in a way that does not depend on to the pumped fluid physical properties. 

That is why they are using head instead of pressure. The following formula converts pressure to the head; H(meter) = 10.2 P/SG or H(feet)= 2.3P/SG

Once the rated flowrate has been determined, the designer subsequently specifies the total head (H) needed at this flowrate. 

This is expressed in meter or feet and represents the usable mechanical work transmitted to the fluid by the pump. Together q and H define the duty point. 

The q/H Curve Test;

The test is carried out at a nominally constant shaft speed, and the head (H) decreases as flowrate (q) increases, giving a negative slope to the curve. (See above H-Q curve) 

Look at the following sketch; this illustrates a simple H-Q curve loop. The test engineer changes the flowrate through discharge control valve and takes measurement of different variables and calculates the corresponding head.  

The first set of measurements is taken at duty point (100 percent q). The valve is opened to give a flowrate greater than the duty flow (normally 120 or 130 percent q), and further readings are taken.

The valve is then closed in a series of steps, progressively decreasing the flow (note that we are moving from right to left on the Q-H curve). With some pumps, the final reading can be taken with the valve closed, i.e. the q = 0 or shut-off condition.

Once the test points are obtained, you can now check against the acceptance criteria requirements

Power Consumption in Centrifugal Pump Performance Test

The power consumption is measured at different flowrates similarly, and the power-flowrate curve is plotted. A wattmeter is connected to motor power input, by multiplying wattmeter amount at motor efficiency the motor output power is calculated at different flowrates. Through these corresponding readings, the power-flowrate curve is plotted.

The Efficiency-Flowrate Curve at Centrifugal Pump Performance Test

The efficiency-flowrate (ƞ-Q) curve can be plotted based on measured values from combination of H-q curve and P-q curve and this formula ƞ=(P out of Pump)/(P input of Pump)=ρgHQ/(P input of pump)    (ρ is density, g is gravitational acceleration, H is Head and Q is Flowrate)

Pump efficiency (ƞ percent): the efficiency is the ratio of transferred mechanical work of the fluid to consumed power (P) in watts by the pump.

The efficiency test; the efficiency is checked using the same set of test measurements as the q/H test. Pump efficiency is plotted against q in above figure. 

You may also review third party inspection for centrifugal pump and pump inspection and test plan articles as supplementary information. 

This content provides you with a sample Centrifugal Pump Performance Test Procedure in the manufacturing shop. The procedure is very brief and general.

Centrifugal Pump Performance Test Procedure

1.Scope

This description of procedure defines the conditions for the hydraulic testing of centrifugal pumps according to API Standard 610.

Scope of test, type of test, test class and guarantee values are defined by standardized test plans agreed between pump manufacturer and pump purchaser.

2. Objective

Objective of the tests is the continuous control of performance data as process control, keeping the guarantees given according to the supply agreement, testing of relevant pump functions.

Preparation of test reports and test curves according to the supply agreement as integral part of the test documentation.

3. Standards and Other Regulations Applicable

  • API 610
  • Manufacture Standard

4. Centrifugal Pump Performance Test procedure

4.1 Testing Personnel

For the handling of the test beds, only trained personnel is employed. The setting of test data is done semi-automatically and requires appropriate test experience and accuracy.

4.2 Place and Time Of Testing

The testing is done on the test bay of the manufacturer. Only pure cold water with a density of ρ= 1 kg/dm3 is used as the test medium.

Pump block units are normally tested with installed motor. In case of acceptance by the customer, the readiness for the acceptance inspection is notified in time to the sales departments.

4.3 Pump Test Beds

Both of following test beds are available and will be utilized as per purchase order specification

  • Closed System
  • Open System, Alternatively With Booster Pump

4.4 Measurement And Testing Methods

The measurement and evaluation of hydraulic characteristic values is made by means of an electronic data logger.

All relevant data are recorded at the site by means of electronic measuring devices and presented with online electronic data processing at the test sites. After termination of the measurements, the data is transferred to the central computer of the test bay supervision. Unless otherwise specified, the acceptance performance tests are carried out in acc. with API 610, para. 7.3.3.

4.4.1 Measurements Of Flow Rate Q

The flow rate is measured using magnetic inductive flow measuring devices having the specified stabilization distances in front and after the measuring unit. The setting of the capacity is effected by control valves in the discharge pipe.

4.4.2 Measurement of head H (Hd – Hs)

Pressure measurements are made using calibrated measuring transmitters for the measuring point Hs (measuring range -10 up to +40 m wc), for measuring point Hd (measuring range -10 up to +180 m, 150 up to 630 m wc). For visual comparison, calibrated spring manometers are connected in parallel for analogous display.

4.4.3 Measurement of Velocity Head

The velocity head is calculated using the flow rate and the flow cross-section at the pressure measuring point.Δ v2 /2g=(v2 d-v2 s)/2g

Vd = velocity discharge side

Vs = velocity suction side

Δ = velocity difference between suction and discharge side

4.4.4 Measurement of power input (P)

The power input of the pump is determined either electrically by means of a calibrated test motor or by directly measuring the speed of rotation using a torque measuring hub.

The electrical measurement is made according to the two-watt meter method for determining the motor power input. The motor power output is calculated using the motor efficiency curve stored in the test system.

For comparison of guaranteed data, the test system converts the pump power input required for the customer conditions, i.e to the standardized speed and the density of the acually pumped medium.

4.4.5 Measurement Of Speed (n)

The speed measurment occurs by means of a light barrier or photo sensor. For canned motor pumps, not accessible from the outside, the speed is determined by means of a bend coil or by frequency analysis.

4.4.6 Measurement of Pump Effeciency (η)

The pump efficiency is determined for each measuring point immediately following the measurement by the testing system.

According to the following formula:η=(Q×H×ρ×100)/(367×P)

Flow rate Q [m³/h]

Head H [m]

Density ρ [kg/dm3] of pumped medium

Power P [kW]

4.4.7 Measurement of the NPSH value of the pump (NPSH required)

Normally in the closed circuit, the measurement of the NPSH value is made by reducing the system pressure by means of a vacuum pump. Measurement also is done by throttling using a throttle valve in the suction line, as the case may be.

Reaching the guaranteed value at the required NPSH value can be proven using the following 2 measuring methods.

a) Standard

Proof of reaching the required NPSH value by setting the peripheral conditions which are equal inthe system such as flow rate, head when reducing the suction pressure depending on the water temperature and the barometric level.

Comparison of head, taken from the characteristic curve measurement above, with the head measured at actual suction negative pressure where the guaranteed NPSH value is achieved or is not achieved.

The head decrease may not exceed 3 % of H, but does not have to achieve 3 % (for single-stage pumps).

According to the specifications in the order, 1 or 3 to 5 measuring points are used. For 2 stage pumps, the max head decrease may not be ΔH≤1.5 %

So NPSH test for multi stage pump is not possible.

b) Optional as Head Breakdown Curve

Proof of the min. achievable NPSH value at a specific constant flow. By reducing the suctionhead, starting at NPSH = 40 m, a number of measuring points (8-12) are recorded until the pumping breaks down. The cut-off point at 3 % head decrease since the beginning of the measurement results in the cavitation condition of the pump at this point and is defined in the applicable standards as NPSH required (for 2 stage pumps 1.5% ΔH)

Reference level for calculation of the NPSH

a) Horizontal Pumps

Horizontal level through the shaft axis

b) Vertical Pumps

Plane surface vertical to shaft axis at impeller inlet

Calculation of The NPSH Based on The Measured or Known Parameters:

The calculation of the NPSH value occurs simultaneously with the measurement.

The following parameters are required for this:

Suction headH_S [m]

Water temperaturet_w [°C]

Steam pressure of water(absolute vaporization pressure)H_t [m]=P_D/(ρ×g)

Atmospheric pressure (absolute)

Atmospheric height (absolute)b_0 [m]=P_O/(ρ×g)

Distance reference level/measurement levelY[m]

Speed at suction side(V_S2 )/2g[m]

Density of test field waterρ[kg/(dm3 )]

Acceleration due to gravityg [m/s²]

The NPSH is calculated according to the following formula:NPSH=P_O/(ρ×g)-H_S-P_D/(ρ×g)+(V_S2)/2g∓Y


NPSH=b_0-H_S-H_t+(V_S2 )/2g

The conversion of the NPSH value from the measured speed to the nominal speed is made according to the following formula (only valid for the speed range ± 3 %):n* /n>0.97<1.03


〖NPSH〗* =NPSH×〖[n* /n]〗2 [m]


Q* =Q×n* /n [m3 /h]

4.4.8 Additional Measurements

Upon request, the electrical current I [A] and the voltage U [V] can also be measured.

4.5 Number of measuring points

The number of measuring points for the pump characteristic curve or NPSH measurements must

be agreed in the supply agreement.

Characteristic curve at 0, Qmin, Qmean, Qnom, Q120%, standard measurement of 5 points (9 max.)

NPSH measurement 0, Qmin, Qmean, Qnom, Q120% 4 points (7 max.)

5 Centrifugal Pump Performance Test – Guarantees

The rated values of the pump are guaranteed in compliance with API 610 provided that no other customer requirements exist. The measuring of tolerances is done automatically by the measuring system.

For viscous media, only the specified data for cold water is guaranteed. The results with viscosity will be shown for information as conversion curves according to Hydraulic Institute.

6 Centrifugal Pump Performance Test – Vibration measurement

To assess the mechanical and hydraulic operating behavior of the pump tested, vibrations are recorded at the same time as the hydraulic date (min. 5 points).

Measurement is carried out in three planes – horizontal, vertical and axial – by means of vibration pick-ups fitted on the bearing bracket. The measureng criterion is the root mean square velocity of all vibrations determined (vibration velocity RMS in mm/s).

The limit stipulated by API 610 is for horizontal pumps 3 mm/s in the preferred operating range of the pump. In the allowable operating range, a vibration velocity of up to 3.9 mm/s (max.) is permissible. For vertical pumps the limit 5 mm/s in the preferred range and 6,5 mm/s in the allowable range is applicable.

Alternatively, it is also possible to measure the max. vibration amplitude (peak-to-peak).

Horizontal

Limit in preferred range: 2,0 mils (50 μm)

Limit in allowable range: 2,6 mils (65 μm)

Vertical

4,0 mils (100 μm)

5,2 mils (130 μm)

The frequency spectrum (FFT analysis) can be measured, if requested.

7 Centrifugal Pump Performance Test – Measurement of Bearing Temperature

If required, the measurement of the bearing temperature will be performed for a specified operating time. The measurement is taken on the bearing bracket on the outside at the level and position of the pump side or motor side bearing in horizontal direction.

8 Centrifugal Pump Performance Test report

The test results are stored in the central computer of the test bay supervision and on other electronic data carriers. Upon request, test reports and test curves are prepared for the customer.

Executive Summary & Industrial Inspection Scope

In demanding industrial environments across Oil, Gas, Petrochemical, Offshore, and Heavy Process Infrastructure, rigorous compliance with ISO 9001 / ASME / API is essential to ensure operational integrity, personnel safety, and compliance with statutory regulatory frameworks. This technical specification provides QA/QC managers, procurement engineers, welding inspectors, and third-party inspection (TPI) agencies with an authoritative, field-tested guideline for “Centrifugal Pump Performance Test”.

Ensuring compliance regarding centrifugal pump performance test minimizes the risk of catastrophic asset failures, costly unscheduled shutdowns, and supplier non-conformances. The following technical sections delineate the scope of inspection, mandatory verification protocols, acceptance criteria, documentation deliverables, and root cause mitigation strategies.

Governing International Engineering Codes & Specifications

Verification and validation of Centrifugal Pump Performance Test must strictly conform to the latest editions of the following international engineering codes and project specifications:
• **Primary Standard Reference:** ISO 9001 / ASME / API
• **Quality Management & Inspection Systems:** ISO 9001:2015 & ISO/IEC 17020 (Requirements for the operation of various types of bodies performing inspection)
• **Material Compliance & Traceability:** EN 10204 Type 3.1 / 3.2 Inspection Certificates for metallic and non-metallic pressure-retaining components
• **Personnel Qualification:** ASNT SNT-TC-1A / ISO 9712 for NDT personnel, CSWIP 3.1 / AWS CWI for welding inspection, and NACE / AMPP Level 2/3 for coating and corrosion personnel
• **Statutory & Health Safety Directives:** ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC), API Standards, OSHA, and regional local authority regulations.

Step-by-Step Quality Control & Inspection Procedure

The execution of quality surveillance for Centrifugal Pump Performance Test is structured across four progressive QA/QC intervention phases:

Stage 1: Pre-Inspection & Engineering Document Review (Review Point – R)

Prior to commencement of any physical activities or manufacturing operations related to Centrifugal Pump Performance Test, the contractor or vendor must submit all technical submittals to the Owner or TPI agency for formal review and approval.

  • Verification of approved Inspection and Test Plan (ITP) identifying all Hold (H), Witness (W), Review (R), and Surveillance (S) intervention points.
  • Cross-examination of Material Test Reports (MTR / Mill Certificates) against standard design specifications (ISO 9001 / ASME / API).
  • Review and approval of specific Procedure Qualification Records (PQR), Welding Procedure Specifications (WPS), or calibration certificates.
  • Verification that all measurement instruments, gauges, and NDT equipment hold valid calibration certificates from ISO/IEC 17025 accredited calibration laboratories (within 6 to 12 months validity).

Stage 2: In-Process Witnessing & Fabrication Control (Witness / Hold Point – W/H)

During the active execution phase, the certified inspector performs physical surveillance to ensure strict adherence to certified drawings, manufacturing procedures, and code tolerances.

  • Verification of material traceability (heat number, heat treatment lot, plate number) transferred accurately onto fabricated components.
  • Dimensional verification and visual inspection using calibrated gauges, micrometer depth dials, or laser alignment systems.
  • Monitoring ambient environmental parameters (relative humidity, dew point, substrate temperature) when applying surface treatments, welding preheat, or pressure testing.
  • Witnessing non-destructive examination (RT, UT, MT, PT, PMI) at specified percentages according to project critical rating and code requirements.

Stage 3: Final Acceptance, Pressure/Performance Testing & Marking (Hold Point – H)

The culminating milestone where the fully assembled or completed item is subjected to definitive acceptance tests in the presence of the Owner’s Third-Party Inspector (TPI).

  • Execution of pressure proof tests (Hydrostatic at 1.3x to 1.5x MAWP or Pneumatic test) with dual calibrated pressure gauges and temperature recorders.
  • Full visual inspection of completed surfaces, welds, protective coatings, and flange contact faces for absence of mechanical damage or code defects.
  • Validation of permanent stamping, low-stress die markings, nameplate data verification, and barcoding in strict conformity with project specs.
  • Clearing all open punch-list items, non-conformance reports (NCRs), and concession requests prior to issuance of the release note.

Stage 4: Packing, Preservation & Inspection Release (Inspection Release Certificate – IRC)

Ensuring the inspected equipment is adequately protected against atmospheric corrosion, mechanical shock, and marine transit degradation.

  • Inspection of rust preventative coatings, desiccant bags, flange face blind protectors, and vapor corrosion inhibitor (VCI) packaging.
  • Verification of heavy-lift sea fastening lugs, center-of-gravity markings, and export crating compliance (ISPM 15 wooden crating).
  • Compilation and signing of the final Inspection Release Certificate (IRC / Shipping Release) and manufacturer data dossier (MDR).

Technical Acceptance Criteria & Tolerances Matrix

All measurements and physical characteristics must comply with the engineering tolerances and acceptance thresholds tabulated below:

Inspection Parameter / Test Item Applicable Standard & Clause Permissible Tolerance / Acceptance Limit Verification Method Intervention Type
Material Chemical & Mechanical Verification ISO 9001 / ASME / API / EN 10204 3.1 100% compliance with minimum tensile, yield, elongation, and impact values (Charpy V-Notch at design temp) Optical Emission Spectrometry (OES) / MTR Verification Review (R)
Visual & Dimensional Tolerances ISO 9001 / ASME / API / Project Specs Zero cracks, lack of fusion, severe pitting; dimensional tolerances within ±1.0mm to ±3.0mm per code drawings Calibrated Vernier, Bridge Cam, Depth Micrometer Witness (W)
Non-Destructive Examination (NDT) ASME Sec V / ASNT SNT-TC-1A 100% compliant with code acceptance criteria; zero planar defects or unpermitted volumetric indications Radiographic (RT) / Ultrasonic (UT) / Magnetic Particle (MT) Hold (H)
Pressure / Proof Testing (Hydrostatic) ISO 9001 / ASME / API / ASME Sec VIII Test pressure maintained for minimum 30 to 60 mins; zero pressure drop, zero leakage or visible sweating Dual calibrated Bourdon pressure gauges + Chart Recorder Hold (H)
Surface Prep & Protective Coating Quality SSPC-SP / NACE / ISO 8501 Surface profile 50 – 75 µm; Dry Film Thickness (DFT) within 80/20 rule of specified nominal thickness Replica Tape (ASTM D4417) & Magnetic Gauge (SSPC-PA 2) Witness (W)
Nameplate & Final Preservation Verification API / ASME / Client Specs 316L SS nameplate securely affixed with correct design code, MAWP, design temp, and national board stamping Physical visual check & VCI preservation verification Hold (H)

Mandatory QA/QC Dossier & Inspection Deliverables

Prior to the final issuance of the Inspection Release Certificate (IRC), the contractor and vendor must compile and submit the verified manufacturer data record containing:

  • Approved Inspection & Test Plan (ITP) with sign-off stamps by Contractor, Client, and TPI.
  • Material Test Reports (MTR / Mill Test Certificates EN 10204 Type 3.1 or 3.2).
  • Certified Welding Procedure Specifications (WPS), Procedure Qualification Records (PQR), and Welder Performance Qualifications (WPQ).
  • Calibration Certificates for all test instruments and measuring equipment (NABL / ISO 17025 accredited).
  • Non-Destructive Examination Reports (RT, UT, MT, PT, PMI, Ferrite Content) evaluated by Level II/III inspectors.
  • Heat Treatment & PWHT Time-Temperature Recorder Charts with thermocouple layout drawings.
  • Hydrostatic / Pneumatic Pressure Proof Test Certificate with calibrated chart recorder logs.
  • Surface Preparation and Protective Coating Inspection Reports (Daily environmental log, blast profile, DFT summary).
  • Non-Conformance Report (NCR) and Concession Disposition Closeout Log.
  • Official Inspection Release Certificate (IRC / Shipping Release Note) permitting packing and dispatch.

Common Non-Conformances & Field Mitigation Strategies

Based on extensive third-party inspection field records in oil & gas projects, the following deviations require heightened surveillance:

Defect / Hazard: Material Grade Substitution & Lack of Heat Traceability

Root Cause: Uncontrolled workshop storage, missing color coding, or unverified supplier sub-tier procurement without EN 10204 3.1 documentation.

Preventative Action: Enforce strict 100% Positive Material Identification (PMI) prior to cutting, and mandatory material receiving inspection with physical stamping cross-referenced to original mill test certificates.

Defect / Hazard: Out-of-Tolerance Fit-Up & Alignment Mismatch

Root Cause: Poor thermal cutting, thermal distortion from excessive preheat, or inadequate jigging and tacking arrangements.

Preventative Action: Establish a mandatory Witness/Hold point at joint fit-up before root pass deposition. Use calibrated Hi-Lo gauges to verify bevel angle, root face, and root gap according to the qualified WPS.

Defect / Hazard: Premature Coating Delamination & Blistering Under Film

Root Cause: Excessive soluble salt contamination (>20 mg/m²) left on the substrate, blast cleaning below dew point (<3°C above dew point), or oil/moisture in the blasting compressor air line.

Preventative Action: Perform Blotter Test (ASTM D4285) daily on compressed air, enforce Bresle patch chloride testing, and apply primer within 4 hours of abrasive blasting before rust blooming initiates.

Defect / Hazard: Pressure Drop During Final Hydrostatic Proof Testing

Root Cause: Micro-leakage through temporary test flange gaskets, entrapped air pockets inside vessel high points, or inadequate temperature stabilization.

Preventative Action: Ensure thorough venting at all high-point vents until bubble-free fluid emerges, allow minimum 15-minute temperature stabilization between filling medium and ambient metal, and torque all blind flanges with calibrated torque wrenches.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: What are the mandatory qualifications for inspectors verifying Centrifugal Pump Performance Test?

A: Inspectors must hold recognized international certifications applicable to the discipline. For welding and fabrication: CSWIP 3.1/3.2, AWS CWI, or API 510/570 Source Inspector. For NDT: ISO 9712 or ASNT SNT-TC-1A Level II minimum. For coatings: NACE / AMPP Level 2 or FROSIO Level III. Additionally, the inspection agency must operate under an ISO/IEC 17020 accredited quality management system.

Q: How does PtroTek resolve non-conformances (NCRs) encountered during vendor surveillance?

A: When a deviation from certified drawings or ISO 9001 / ASME / API is detected, the inspector issues a formal Non-Conformance Report (NCR) within 24 hours. The vendor must submit a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and proposed disposition (Rework, Repair, or Concession). Work on the affected component is halted (Hold Point) until the Owner’s engineering authority approves the disposition and a re-inspection confirms full compliance.

Q: What is the difference between Witness (W) and Hold (H) points in an Inspection & Test Plan (ITP)?

A: A Hold Point (H) is a mandatory milestone where fabrication or testing CANNOT proceed without the physical presence of the designated client or third-party inspector. Written clearance or stamping is strictly required. A Witness Point (W) requires prior notification (typically 24 to 48 hours) to the inspector; however, if the inspector fails to attend at the scheduled time, fabrication or testing may proceed with subsequent review of the test records.

Q: Can international clients review inspection reports and photos in real time?

A: Yes. PtroTek provides comprehensive Flash Reports issued within 24 hours of inspection completion, followed by detailed formal inspection reports accompanied by high-resolution calibrated photographic evidence, dimension logs, and signed vendor test records for complete global transparency.

Need Certified Third-Party Inspection (TPI) Support?

PtroTek provides international vendor surveillance, ASME code vessel inspection, welding QA/QC, and protective coating verification across Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and global fabrication hubs.

Request a Technical Inspection Quote