Our Articles
You can choos our articles from menu in below …
The Pressure Vessel Plate article provides you information about the ASME Code requirement regarding plate material and related points in the pressure vessel inspection.
You need to take care about your Pressure Vessel Plate Materials, there are lots of requirements and specific prohibitions in the ASME code.
Some of these requirements are ASME and Non ASME plate materials, plate specifications, inspection requirements and material test reports. This article describes these requirements for you.
What is ASME Material?
ASME Code Sec VIII DIV 1 requires the materials that are used for pressure containing parts to be one of:

Material specified in ASME section II materials but with some restrictions, which are stated in ASME Code Sec VIII Div 1 in subsection C e.g. UCS, UHF, UNF.
For example, SA 283 plate material is listed in ASME Sec II, but when you refer to subsection C in Sec VIII Div 1, you see it is not allowed to be used for lethal substance services as well as for unfired steam boilers. Also, you cannot use this material when you need your thickness to be greater than 5/8 inch.
What is Difference Between ASTM Material and ASME Material?
When you refer to ASME Section II Part A, you see all material with SA prefix identification and on one side there is an ASTM logo, and on the other side is ASME logo.
But the ASTM prefix is single A.
The material specification in ASME Section II Part A was originally developed by ASTM and then reviewed and adopted by ASME Code. That is the reason you see both societies’ Logos.
For example, if you open the SA 516 material specification in ASME Section II, material Part A, edition 2004, you will see this statement below the page title:
“Identical with ASTM specification A 516/ A516M-90”;
This means you can use A 516 Edition 1990 instead SA 516 2004.
But if your ASTM material is A 516 and not manufactured based on ASTM Edition 1990, you cannot use this material unless you do the assessment based on clause UG-10 in ASME Section VIII Div 1, and your assessment result will determine either it is permissible, or you need to do more tests to recertify this material.
For some materials, the specifications are not identical or may be identical with some exceptions, so again we cannot use these ASTM material unless we make an assessment based on the above mentioned clause (UG-10)
Is it possible to use Non ASME material instead of ASME Section II material?
The answer is “Yes,” but with some conditions. These conditions ar addressed in UG-10(a) as following items:
- Melting method, melting practice, deoxidation, quality and heat treatment to be same between suggested non-ASME material and equivalent permitted ASME section II material.
- Material certificate proves there is no conflict in chemical analysis between suggested non-ASME material and equivalent permitted ASME material.
- Material certificate proves the suggested non-ASME material was produced and tested in accordance to equivalent permitted ASME material.
- The material certificate to be recertified by the equivalent permitted ASME material with a notation of “ Certified per UG-10”
Example:
A manufacturer received an order for manufacturing a pressure vessel with an SA 516 Gr.60 pressure vessel plate normalized material, but apparently this material is not available in the market…
So the material supplier recommended to the pressure vessel manufacturer to purchase an available P265GH material instead. The manufacturer requested a copy of the material certificate for P265GH to verify for recertification per UG-10.
Pressure Vessel Manufacturer Assessment:
Step 1: Checking of melting method, melting practices, deoxidation, and heat treatment
P265GH is produced based on the European EN-10028 Standard, manufacturer controls plate material certificate and confirms:
Melting method, practice, deoxidation and heat treatment are consistent with SA 516 Gr.60 specification, the current available P265GH material produced by basic oxygen process and secondary vacuum process refinement and both normalized.
Step 2: Plate material certificate prove there is no conflict in chemical analysis between the suggested non-ASME material and the equivalent permitted ASME material.
The manufacture controlled chemical analysis in pressure vessel plate material certificate of P265GH with SA 516 Gr.60 specification and confirm everything is in specific minimum or ranged limits.
Step 3: Plate material certificate prove the suggested non-ASME material produced and tested in accordance to equivalent permitted ASME material.
Manufacturer the first control with the required number of test specimens for each mechanical test, as well as the size of specimens and confirm that both standards are the same;
Then check the plate material mechanical test result for yield stress, tensile strength and elongation and confirm all are in specific range of SA 516 Gr.60.
Manufacturer control for plate material impact test requirement and notice impact test carried out by ISO V method and in – 53 degree F;
But SA 516 Gr.60 requires to be impact tested in -60 degree F with Charpy V-notch test method based on SA 370 Specification so there are two conflicts here. First is the test method, and seconder is in the test temperature.
So pressure vessel manufacturer requests that the plate material supplier provide a test plate and send the test piece to a laboratory for impact testing based the SA 516 Gr.60 specification.
The lab test report confirms that the P265GH plate material covers the SA 516 Gr.60 impact testing requirement.
Step 4: The material certificate is to be recertified by the equivalent permitted ASME material with a notation of “Certified per UG-10.”
The manufacturer purchases the P265GH plate material and changes the marking on the plate and also rectifies the material test report with SA 516 Gr.60 material. This material identification will be SA 516 Gr.60
In the above example, a vessel manufacturer with doing extra tests recertified a non ASME pressure vessel plate material.
In some other cases, this might not be possible even by extra testing for example if the tensile strength is less than the ASME permitted material.
Sometimes it might be recertified even without any extra test when everything falls in the limitation range of the ASME permitted material.
What is the Other Requirement for Pressure Vessel Plate?
UG-93 in ASME Code Sec VIII Div 1 specifies requirements for plate material inspection.
Based on this clause, only plate material is require to have a material test certificate(MTR).
It means this requirement only can be applied for plate material; for other material such as pipe and flange, MTR’s are not required and marking on the materials would be acceptable.
You need to inspect the plate material per specification of ASME Sec II Part A. For example, for SA 516 Gr.60 refer to this specification and check the chemical composition, mechanical property with your MTR.
You need to check that the Heat Number stated in MTR is the same stenciled on the plate material marking and make sure this MTR belongs to this material.
You need to check your pressure vessel plate dimensions, such as thickness, width, length, weight as per tolerances stated in specification SA 20. Visual inspection for surface defects also need to be done based on SA 20 specification.
Executive Summary & Industrial Inspection Scope
In demanding industrial environments across Oil, Gas, Petrochemical, Offshore, and Heavy Process Infrastructure, rigorous compliance with ASME BPVC Section VIII Div 1 & 2, Section IX, Section V is essential to ensure operational integrity, personnel safety, and compliance with statutory regulatory frameworks. This technical specification provides QA/QC managers, procurement engineers, welding inspectors, and third-party inspection (TPI) agencies with an authoritative, field-tested guideline for “Pressure Vessel Plate”.
Ensuring compliance regarding pressure vessel plate minimizes the risk of catastrophic asset failures, costly unscheduled shutdowns, and supplier non-conformances. The following technical sections delineate the scope of inspection, mandatory verification protocols, acceptance criteria, documentation deliverables, and root cause mitigation strategies.
Governing International Engineering Codes & Specifications
Verification and validation of Pressure Vessel Plate must strictly conform to the latest editions of the following international engineering codes and project specifications:
• **Primary Standard Reference:** ASME BPVC Section VIII Div 1 & 2, Section IX, Section V
• **Quality Management & Inspection Systems:** ISO 9001:2015 & ISO/IEC 17020 (Requirements for the operation of various types of bodies performing inspection)
• **Material Compliance & Traceability:** EN 10204 Type 3.1 / 3.2 Inspection Certificates for metallic and non-metallic pressure-retaining components
• **Personnel Qualification:** ASNT SNT-TC-1A / ISO 9712 for NDT personnel, CSWIP 3.1 / AWS CWI for welding inspection, and NACE / AMPP Level 2/3 for coating and corrosion personnel
• **Statutory & Health Safety Directives:** ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC), API Standards, OSHA, and regional local authority regulations.
Step-by-Step Quality Control & Inspection Procedure
The execution of quality surveillance for Pressure Vessel Plate is structured across four progressive QA/QC intervention phases:
Stage 1: Pre-Inspection & Engineering Document Review (Review Point – R)
Prior to commencement of any physical activities or manufacturing operations related to Pressure Vessel Plate, the contractor or vendor must submit all technical submittals to the Owner or TPI agency for formal review and approval.
- Verification of approved Inspection and Test Plan (ITP) identifying all Hold (H), Witness (W), Review (R), and Surveillance (S) intervention points.
- Cross-examination of Material Test Reports (MTR / Mill Certificates) against standard design specifications (ASME BPVC Section VIII Div 1 & 2, Section IX, Section V).
- Review and approval of specific Procedure Qualification Records (PQR), Welding Procedure Specifications (WPS), or calibration certificates.
- Verification that all measurement instruments, gauges, and NDT equipment hold valid calibration certificates from ISO/IEC 17025 accredited calibration laboratories (within 6 to 12 months validity).
Stage 2: In-Process Witnessing & Fabrication Control (Witness / Hold Point – W/H)
During the active execution phase, the certified inspector performs physical surveillance to ensure strict adherence to certified drawings, manufacturing procedures, and code tolerances.
- Verification of material traceability (heat number, heat treatment lot, plate number) transferred accurately onto fabricated components.
- Dimensional verification and visual inspection using calibrated gauges, micrometer depth dials, or laser alignment systems.
- Monitoring ambient environmental parameters (relative humidity, dew point, substrate temperature) when applying surface treatments, welding preheat, or pressure testing.
- Witnessing non-destructive examination (RT, UT, MT, PT, PMI) at specified percentages according to project critical rating and code requirements.
Stage 3: Final Acceptance, Pressure/Performance Testing & Marking (Hold Point – H)
The culminating milestone where the fully assembled or completed item is subjected to definitive acceptance tests in the presence of the Owner’s Third-Party Inspector (TPI).
- Execution of pressure proof tests (Hydrostatic at 1.3x to 1.5x MAWP or Pneumatic test) with dual calibrated pressure gauges and temperature recorders.
- Full visual inspection of completed surfaces, welds, protective coatings, and flange contact faces for absence of mechanical damage or code defects.
- Validation of permanent stamping, low-stress die markings, nameplate data verification, and barcoding in strict conformity with project specs.
- Clearing all open punch-list items, non-conformance reports (NCRs), and concession requests prior to issuance of the release note.
Stage 4: Packing, Preservation & Inspection Release (Inspection Release Certificate – IRC)
Ensuring the inspected equipment is adequately protected against atmospheric corrosion, mechanical shock, and marine transit degradation.
- Inspection of rust preventative coatings, desiccant bags, flange face blind protectors, and vapor corrosion inhibitor (VCI) packaging.
- Verification of heavy-lift sea fastening lugs, center-of-gravity markings, and export crating compliance (ISPM 15 wooden crating).
- Compilation and signing of the final Inspection Release Certificate (IRC / Shipping Release) and manufacturer data dossier (MDR).
Technical Acceptance Criteria & Tolerances Matrix
All measurements and physical characteristics must comply with the engineering tolerances and acceptance thresholds tabulated below:
| Pressure Vessel QC Parameter | ASME Code Section | Permissible Tolerance & Acceptance Criteria | Verification Method | QC Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shell Plate Forming Out-of-Roundness | ASME Sec VIII Div 1 UG-80 | Max difference between max and min inside diameter (Dmax – Dmin) ≤ 1.0% of nominal ID | Internal Trammel Gauge / Laser Sweep Alignment | Witness (W) |
| Head Forming Profile & Peaking | ASME Sec VIII Div 1 UG-81 | Formed torispherical / 2:1 ellipsoidal head profile shall not deviate by more than +1.25% / -0.625% | Radial Profile Wooden Template / Contour Gauge | Witness (W) |
| Weld Seam Alignment Offset (Mismatch) | ASME Sec VIII Div 1 UW-33 | Longitudinal seams offset ≤ 1.6mm (for t ≤ 13mm); Circumferential joints per UW-33 table | Bridge Cam / Hi-Lo Welding Gauge | Hold (H) |
| Full / Spot Radiographic Examination (RT) | ASME Sec VIII Div 1 UW-51 / UW-52 | Full RT: zero cracks, lack of fusion/penetration; Spot RT: per UW-52 evaluation rules | Gamma Ray (Ir-192) / X-Ray with Densitometer and Film Viewer | Hold (H) |
| Hydrostatic Test Pressure & Hold Time | ASME Sec VIII Div 1 UG-99(b) | Pt = 1.3 × MAWP × (S_test / S_design); Min 30 min hold; zero drop on calibrated digital gauge | Certified Dual Pressure Gauges + Calibrated Temperature Recorder | Hold (H) |
| Nameplate Stamping & Manufacturer Data (U-1A) | ASME Sec VIII Div 1 UG-115 to UG-120 | ASME “U” or “U2” stamp, National Board number, serial number, and authorized inspector signature | Visual review and Authorized Inspector (AI) sign-off | Hold (H) |
Mandatory QA/QC Dossier & Inspection Deliverables
Prior to the final issuance of the Inspection Release Certificate (IRC), the contractor and vendor must compile and submit the verified manufacturer data record containing:
- Approved Inspection & Test Plan (ITP) with sign-off stamps by Contractor, Client, and TPI.
- Material Test Reports (MTR / Mill Test Certificates EN 10204 Type 3.1 or 3.2).
- Certified Welding Procedure Specifications (WPS), Procedure Qualification Records (PQR), and Welder Performance Qualifications (WPQ).
- Calibration Certificates for all test instruments and measuring equipment (NABL / ISO 17025 accredited).
- Non-Destructive Examination Reports (RT, UT, MT, PT, PMI, Ferrite Content) evaluated by Level II/III inspectors.
- Heat Treatment & PWHT Time-Temperature Recorder Charts with thermocouple layout drawings.
- Hydrostatic / Pneumatic Pressure Proof Test Certificate with calibrated chart recorder logs.
- Surface Preparation and Protective Coating Inspection Reports (Daily environmental log, blast profile, DFT summary).
- Non-Conformance Report (NCR) and Concession Disposition Closeout Log.
- Official Inspection Release Certificate (IRC / Shipping Release Note) permitting packing and dispatch.
Common Non-Conformances & Field Mitigation Strategies
Based on extensive third-party inspection field records in oil & gas projects, the following deviations require heightened surveillance:
Defect / Hazard: Material Grade Substitution & Lack of Heat Traceability
Root Cause: Uncontrolled workshop storage, missing color coding, or unverified supplier sub-tier procurement without EN 10204 3.1 documentation.
Preventative Action: Enforce strict 100% Positive Material Identification (PMI) prior to cutting, and mandatory material receiving inspection with physical stamping cross-referenced to original mill test certificates.
Defect / Hazard: Out-of-Tolerance Fit-Up & Alignment Mismatch
Root Cause: Poor thermal cutting, thermal distortion from excessive preheat, or inadequate jigging and tacking arrangements.
Preventative Action: Establish a mandatory Witness/Hold point at joint fit-up before root pass deposition. Use calibrated Hi-Lo gauges to verify bevel angle, root face, and root gap according to the qualified WPS.
Defect / Hazard: Premature Coating Delamination & Blistering Under Film
Root Cause: Excessive soluble salt contamination (>20 mg/m²) left on the substrate, blast cleaning below dew point (<3°C above dew point), or oil/moisture in the blasting compressor air line.
Preventative Action: Perform Blotter Test (ASTM D4285) daily on compressed air, enforce Bresle patch chloride testing, and apply primer within 4 hours of abrasive blasting before rust blooming initiates.
Defect / Hazard: Pressure Drop During Final Hydrostatic Proof Testing
Root Cause: Micro-leakage through temporary test flange gaskets, entrapped air pockets inside vessel high points, or inadequate temperature stabilization.
Preventative Action: Ensure thorough venting at all high-point vents until bubble-free fluid emerges, allow minimum 15-minute temperature stabilization between filling medium and ambient metal, and torque all blind flanges with calibrated torque wrenches.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: What are the mandatory qualifications for inspectors verifying Pressure Vessel Plate?
A: Inspectors must hold recognized international certifications applicable to the discipline. For welding and fabrication: CSWIP 3.1/3.2, AWS CWI, or API 510/570 Source Inspector. For NDT: ISO 9712 or ASNT SNT-TC-1A Level II minimum. For coatings: NACE / AMPP Level 2 or FROSIO Level III. Additionally, the inspection agency must operate under an ISO/IEC 17020 accredited quality management system.
Q: How does PtroTek resolve non-conformances (NCRs) encountered during vendor surveillance?
A: When a deviation from certified drawings or ASME BPVC Section VIII Div 1 & 2, Section IX, Section V is detected, the inspector issues a formal Non-Conformance Report (NCR) within 24 hours. The vendor must submit a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and proposed disposition (Rework, Repair, or Concession). Work on the affected component is halted (Hold Point) until the Owner’s engineering authority approves the disposition and a re-inspection confirms full compliance.
Q: What is the difference between Witness (W) and Hold (H) points in an Inspection & Test Plan (ITP)?
A: A Hold Point (H) is a mandatory milestone where fabrication or testing CANNOT proceed without the physical presence of the designated client or third-party inspector. Written clearance or stamping is strictly required. A Witness Point (W) requires prior notification (typically 24 to 48 hours) to the inspector; however, if the inspector fails to attend at the scheduled time, fabrication or testing may proceed with subsequent review of the test records.
Q: Can international clients review inspection reports and photos in real time?
A: Yes. PtroTek provides comprehensive Flash Reports issued within 24 hours of inspection completion, followed by detailed formal inspection reports accompanied by high-resolution calibrated photographic evidence, dimension logs, and signed vendor test records for complete global transparency.
Need Certified Third-Party Inspection (TPI) Support?
PtroTek provides international vendor surveillance, ASME code vessel inspection, welding QA/QC, and protective coating verification across Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and global fabrication hubs.




